ISO Survival Kit: Top 100 ISO/IEC 19770-1 Lead Auditor Audit Failures (And How to Avoid Them)

Blog Image

Written by Matthew Hale

Share This Blog


Is your IT asset management truly audit-ready on pen compliance? 

 

The growing pressure has built up as digital transformation speeds up with asset sprawl continuing into cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. 

 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 provides an internationally recognized framework for establishing a standards-based IT Asset Management System (ITAMS ), which in turn would ensure that controls, accountability, and alignment with risk, cost, and compliance objectives are maintained. 

 

But here's the catch: many organizations fail their ISO/IEC 19770-1 audits not for intentional lack but because of missing documentation, unmonitored assets, badly defined roles, and no management through life cycle processes. 

 

This guide was developed using insights from over 100 ISO/IEC 19770-1 Lead Auditors and ITAM experts, including those affiliated with recognized certification bodies such as the Global Skill Development Council (GSDC)



Be it your first day preparing for the ISO/IEC 19770-1 certification, building an internal compliance function, or integrating IT asset governance into your ITSM or GRC strategy, the survival kit is at your audit resource.

Top 100 ISO/IEC 19770-1 Lead Auditor Audit Failures

1. No Formal ITAM Policy in Place

 

📌 Clause: 5.1 – Leadership and Commitment

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

Organizations operate with informal practices but lack a documented IT Asset Management (ITAM) policy that defines purpose, scope, and leadership intent.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

A formal policy is required by the ISO/IEC 19770-1 framework to demonstrate top management commitment and system direction. Auditors see its absence as a critical governance failure.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Draft an ITAM policy signed by executive leadership.
     
  • Define objectives, scope, governance, and compliance obligations.
     
  • Communicate it across business and technical teams.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Provides a clear foundation for audit scope and ensures strategic alignment across all ITAM activities.

 

2. Roles and Responsibilities Are Not Clearly Defined

 

📌 Clause: 5.3 – Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

ITAM responsibilities are vaguely shared across IT, procurement, and finance teams with no clear ownership or accountability.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 requires defined roles for asset lifecycle, risk, inventory, and license management. Without clarity, auditors cannot verify control coverage.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Map roles to ITAM processes and assign named owners.
     
  • Update job descriptions and RACI matrices.
     
  • Review and adjust annually or during organizational changes.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Stronger accountability, faster audits, and reduced risk of asset mismanagement.

 

3. Missing Inventory of IT Assets

 

📌 Clause: 8.1 – Planning and Control of Asset Management Processes

What’s Going Wrong:
 

No up-to-date inventory exists for hardware or software assets. Discovery tools may be in place but unmonitored or misconfigured.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 requires a complete, accurate inventory as the backbone of the ITAM system. Incomplete records are a major non-conformity.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Implement automated discovery tools across all environments.
     
  • Reconcile inventory with procurement, finance, and CMDB sources.
     
  • Review data accuracy monthly.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Improved audit traceability, licensing accuracy, and faster incident or cost analysis.

 

4. No Link Between Asset Inventory and Procurement Records

 

📌 Clause: 8.2 – Lifecycle Processes

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

Procured assets are not automatically added to the asset register, leading to untracked hardware and software.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

The ISO/IEC 19770-1 checklist expects full lifecycle traceability from acquisition to retirement. Gaps raise red flags on asset control.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Integrate ITAM with procurement and ERP systems.
     
  • Establish a handover workflow for new purchases.
     
  • Validate record completeness monthly.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Tighter compliance with contract terms and reduced software audit risk.

 

5. Inadequate Control Over Software License Compliance

 

📌 Clause: 8.3 – Software Asset Management Controls

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

Organizations cannot show if deployed software aligns with purchased entitlements. Shadow IT 

and over-installation are common.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

License compliance is a high-risk area. Auditors assess how software use is monitored, restricted, and reconciled with contractual rights.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Centralize entitlement data and perform software reconciliations quarterly.
     
  • Implement metering and usage alerts.
     
  • Define escalation paths for non-compliance.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Reduced financial exposure from vendor audits and better control over software spending.

 

6. Assets Not Classified by Risk or Criticality

 

📌 Clause: 6.1 – Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

All assets are treated equally regardless of their business impact, value, or security posture.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

The ISO/IEC 19770-1 framework mandates risk-based prioritization. Auditors will check if critical assets receive appropriate controls.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Classify assets by business function, data sensitivity, and operational criticality.
     
  • Apply differentiated controls and review periodically.
     
  • Link classifications to backup, monitoring, and renewal strategies.
     

Real-World Result:
 

More efficient asset protection and alignment with IT risk management practices.

 

7. No Evidence of Asset Lifecycle Planning

 

📌 Clause: 8.2 – Lifecycle Processes

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

Assets are tracked reactively with no strategy for refresh, redeployment, or secure disposal.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 requires planned processes from acquisition through retirement. Ad hoc decisions indicate immature asset governance.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Develop lifecycle standards and policies per asset type.
     
  • Schedule end-of-life reviews and disposal planning.
     
  • Align with financial depreciation and security practices.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Fewer surprises, lower support costs, and improved ROI on asset investments.

 

8. Configuration Items Not Mapped to Asset Inventory

 

📌 Clause: 7.5 – Documented Information

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

CMDB and ITAM systems operate in silos, leading to duplicate, conflicting, or missing records.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 encourages integration with ITSM. Unlinked data affects change, incident, and security response accuracy.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Synchronize CMDB and asset inventory through shared identifiers.
     
  • Conduct data mapping exercises quarterly.
     
  • Involve ITSM and ITAM teams in change reviews.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Faster incident resolution and a unified view of asset health and configuration.

 

9. No Regular Internal ITAM Audits Conducted

 

📌 Clause: 9.2 – Internal Audit

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

ITAM controls are not independently reviewed, leaving performance gaps and non-conformities unidentified.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

ISO/IEC 19770-1 certification depends on self-monitoring. A missing audit trail is seen as a breakdown in continual improvement.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Create an internal audit plan with risk-based coverage.
     
  • Train auditors on the ISO/IEC 19770-1 checklist and clause structure.
     
  • Track corrective actions through to closure.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Early detection of system weaknesses and improved audit preparedness.

 

10. Asset Disposal Is Uncontrolled or Poorly Documented

 

📌 Clause: 8.2.6 – Retirement and Disposal

 

What’s Going Wrong:
 

Old devices are discarded or reused without documentation, data wiping, or chain of custody controls.

 

Why It Matters During an Audit:
 

Auditors require evidence of secure, compliant, and traceable disposal to reduce the risk of data leakage or financial loss.

 

How to Fix It:

 
  • Establish standard disposal workflows and vendor controls.
     
  • Require certificates of destruction or transfer logs.
     
  • Include disposal in lifecycle training and audits.
     

Real-World Result:
 

Greater assurance around data protection and reduced legal or reputational exposure.

Download the Full ISO/IEC 19770-1 Audit Survival Guide

 

This blog covered only the first 10 of the top 100 audit failures.
 

To dive deeper, download the complete list of clause-based non-conformities, including:

 
  • Actionable fixes aligned with the ISO/IEC 19770-1 framework
     
  • Real-world examples from experienced Lead Auditors
     
  • Insights to strengthen internal audit readiness
     
  • A practical tool for ITAM leaders and compliance managers
     

Don’t leave your IT asset management compliance to chance.
 

Download the full guide and take control of your audit outcome.

Real-time Interview Scenario with AI

Strengthening Your ISO/IEC 19770-1 Compliance Journey

For organizations, it will translate compliance with ISO/IEC 19770-1 into a checkmark in IT, but from strategic compliance into responsible, accountable, and risk-informed asset management IT. 

 

As organizations grow and change with their technology estates, the need for a proper, auditable system will go beyond certification to, ultimately, resilience and cost security, etc.

 

This guide took you through the more popular ISO/IEC 19770-1 Lead Auditor audit pitfalls-from policy and role omissions through inventory holes to license exposure. 

 

Each of these nonconformities also delivers a larger message: Strong asset management is built on governance, integration, and continual validation.

Related Certifications

Jane Doe

Matthew Hale

Learning Advisor

Matthew is a dedicated learning advisor who is passionate about helping individuals achieve their educational goals. He specializes in personalized learning strategies and fostering lifelong learning habits.

Enjoyed this blog? Share this with someone who’d find this useful


If you like this read then make sure to check out our previous blogs: Cracking Onboarding Challenges: Fresher Success Unveiled

Not sure which certification to pursue? Our advisors will help you decide!

Already decided? Claim 20% discount from Author. Use Code REVIEW20.